COURSE OUTLINE FOR MANAGEMENT TEAM TRAINING
COMPILED FOR DISCUSSION IN 1980-85 WORKSHOPS BY:
Jim Carroll (Orange County Schools), Marcus Johnston FSLRS and
Ron Stone (Taylor County Schools)
IMPACT BARGAINING -- A DISCUSSION
I. SCOPE OF BARGAINING / INTRODUCTION
A. Constitutional Basis - Article 1, Section 6 of
the
Florida Constitution
"The right of employees by and through a
labor organization, to bargain collectively
shall not be denied or abridged."
B. Statutory Basis - Section 447.309(l) of the Florida
Statute
Imposes upon the parties the duty to bargain
in good faith with respect to "wages, hours,
and terms and conditions of employment."
C. The extent to which a public employer must bargain
with
the union as to a unilateral change depends on
the
category of the subject of the change.
II. CATEGORIES OF BARGAINING
A. Mandatory Subjects of Bargaining
- Mandatory subjects of bargaining generally fall
squarely into the ambient of "wages, hours, and terms
and conditions of employment."
- Public employers have a duty to bargain about the
decision to make the change and the effect of the
change on the employees.
- The duty to bargain about the effect of the change
on
employees is called impact bargaining.
- Refusal to bargain these mandatory subjects is a
per se
violation of the PERA.
B. Permissive Subjects of Bargaining
- Subjects which do not fit into the ambient of
"wages,
hours, and terms and duties of employment" are
permissive subjects of bargaining.
- Public employers have a duty to bargain about the
effect of the change (impact bargaining), but not the
decision to make the change.
C. Illegal Subjects of Bargaining
A relatively small number of topics have been
found to be
unlawful to bargain as the effect of their implementation would
violate law or public policy. [Eg. A contract provision which
required all employees, including non-union members to contribute
a portion of their sick leave to a "union time pool" was unlawful
because it interfered with a nonunion members right to refrain
from participating in union activities. Delaney V. City of
Hialeah v. AFSCME, Local 3032, 9 FPER 14,339 (1983),
aff'd, 10
FPER 15,300(1984)
III. IMPACT BARGAINING
Thus, impact bargaining is the employer's
obligation to
bargain over the effects of unilateral management
decisions
regarding areas of permissive,
bargaining.
IV. EXAMPLES OF MANDATORY SUBJECTS OF
BARGAINING
A. Wages
- Step increments - Nassau Teachers Ass'n, FTP-NEA
v.
School Bd. of Nassau County, 8 FPER 13,206
(1982)
- Holiday compensation - Teamsters Local 444 v.
City of Winter
Park, 5 FPER 10,059 (1979)
- Salary schedule - Pasco Classroom Teachers'
Ass'n v. School
Bd. of Pasco County, 3 FPER 9 (1976), aff'd, 353 So.
2d 108
(Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
- Coaching supplements - In re Petition for
Declaratory
Statement of the Levy Co. Education Ass'n and the School
District of Levy County, 11 FPER 16,096 (1985)
B. Hours
- Overtime - Sarasota Professional Fire Fighters
v. City of
Sarasota, 13 FPER 18,033 (1986)
- Work schedule - IBPO, Local 621 v. City of
Hollywood, 7 FPER
12,293 (1981)
C. Terms and conditions of employment
- Absenteeism policy - ATU, Local 1596 v.
Orange-Seminole-Osceola Transportation Authority, 12 FPER
170134 (1986)
- Discipline and discharge - Duval Teachers
United, FEA/U-AFT,
AFL-CIO v Duval County School Board, 3 FPER 96
(1977)
3. Grievance procedure - In re Communication
Workers of
America, 4 FPER 4135 (1978)
- Health insurance - Pinellas County PBA v. City
of Dunedin, 8
FPER 13,102 (1982)
- Holidays - Teamsters Local 444 V. City of Winter
Haven, 5
FPER 10,089 (1979)
- Instructional periods, teacher workload --
Indian
River County Educ. Ass'n, Local 3617 v. School
Board of Indian River County, 4 FPER 4262 (1978),
aff'd 373 So.
2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
- Length of work year -- Palowitcb, v. Orange
County School
Board, 3 FPER 280 (1977), aff'd, 367 So. 2d 730 (Fla.
4th
DCA. 1979)
- Retirement - City of Tallahassee v. PERC,
410 So. 2d 487
(Fla. 1981)
- School calendar - Bradford Education Association
v. Bradford
County School Board, 9 FPER 14,155 (1983)
- Teacher planning days -- Pasco Classroom
Teacher's Ass'n v.
School Board of Pasco County, 3 FPER 9 (1976), aff'd,
353
So, 2d 108 (Fla. lst DCA 1977)
- Transfer -- In re Levy County School Bd., 5
FPER 10,213
(1979)
V. EXAMPLES OF PERMISSIVE SUBJECTS OF BARGAINING
- Abolition and creation of bargaining unit
positions -NAME v. City of Casselberry, 10 FPER 15,205
(1984)
- Assignment of employees - Manatee Education
Assn v.
Manatee County School Bd., 7 FPER 12,017 (1980)
- Class size - Hillsborough Classroom Teachers
Ass'n v.
School Bd. of Hillsborough County, 8 FPER 13,074 (1982)
aff'd, 423 So. 2d 969 (Fla. lst DCA 1983)
- Instructional periods for students - Indian
River
County Educ. Ass'n, Local 3617, FEA/U-AFT v. School Bd.
of Indian River County, 4 FPER 4262 (1978), aff'd 373
So. 2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA. 1979)
- Minimum staffing levels - Hillsborough
Classroom
Teachers Ass'n v. School Board of Hillsborough County,
7 FPER 120411 (1981) aff1d 423 So. 2d 969(Fla. lst DCA
1983)
- Student day (starting and ending times - Duval
Teachers
United, FEA/United Local 3326 v School Board of Duval
County, 6 FPER 11,271 (1980)
- Closing of work site - IAFF, Local 1403 v.
Metropolitan
Dade County, 11 FPER 16,285 (1985)
- Drug testing - City of Miami Fraternal Order
of Police,
Miami Lodge 20, 15 FLW 979 (Fla. 3d DCA April 17,
1990), rev'd, 12 FPER 17,029 (1985)
- Institution of time clock - Federation of
Public
Employees v. School District of Broward County, 14 FPER
19,159 (1988)
VI. NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO BARGAIN
The employer has an obligation to provide notice
to the
union that it intends to make a unilateral change and then afford
the union an opportunity to bargain over any impact.
VII. DEMAND FOR BARGAINING
The employer has no obligation to bargain about
impact until
the union has made a demand for bargaining.
VIII. EMPLOYER DEFENSES UNILATERAL CHANGES WITHOUT
BARGAINING
A. Waiver
- A waiver by the union extinguishes the right to
insist
on negotiations.
- Kinds of waivers
- Contractual waivers
- Waiver by inaction
B. Exigent circumstances
C. Exhaustion of impasse procedures and legislative
body action under 447.403(4)(e)
**END**
This site maintained for educational organizations by
The Florida School Labor Relations Service
a Joint Venture of the
Florida School Boards Association
and the
Florida Association of District School Superintendents
for the
FLORIDA EDUCATIONAL NEGOTIATORS
Suggestions, critique and e-mail to FSLRS