OFFICIAL PEUBLICATION OF THE O R D E R
S U M M A R Y
PLEASE COPY TO SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
AND
ADMINISTRATORS AS NEEDED.
**School Board
Cases
VOL. XXV . . . . . . . . . . . . December 12, 2001 .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . NO. 43
PART I. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ORDERS ISSUED BY PERC
CB-2001-032;Order
01GC-311(December 4, 2001)
KEITH PERRY, Charging
Party,
v.
FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
COUNCIL 79, AFSCME, Respondent.
The General Counsel
summarily dismisses the charge that the union violated the Act by breaching its
duty of fair representation. AThe pertinent facts in the
charge allege that Perry, an AFSCME member, was dismissed from his employment
with the State on August 26, 1999.
Perry requested AFSCME to file a grievance challenging the dismissal
pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between the State and
AFSCME. AFSCME assigned Ronald
Highsmith to represent Perry but Highsmith failed to timely initiate a Step 2
grievance within fourteen days.@
Since all the pertinent
facts occurred more than six months ago, the charge is untimely.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
CA-2001-060;Order
01GC-312(December 4, 2001)
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
CITY EMPLOYEES, INC., Charging Party,
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE,
Respondent.
The General Counsel
summarily dismisses the amended charge that the employer violated the Act by
not allowing an employee to attend a union meeting. AIn its amendment to the original charge, PACE alleges that
union officer wanted time off from his job to attend a union class about
grievance processing and contract negotiation.
PACE argues that this activity would benefit employees who will have
better representation because of better trained union officers. However, in absence of an agreement from the
City, union officials are not entitled to paid leave to attend union training
classes.@
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
CB-2001-022;Order
01U-313(December 6, 2001)
GERONIA FREDERICK, Charging
Party,
v.
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
CITY EMPLOYEES, Respondent.
PERC affirms the General
Counsel=s summary dismissal of the
charge that the union violated the Act by refusing to assist in a grievance
procedure.
It is undisputed that
Geronia Frederick is not a member of PACE and since the appeal was not timely
filed it must be dismissed.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
RD-2001-007;Order
01E-314(December 6, 2001)
WILLIAM DOERING,
Petitioner,
v.
AFSCME FLORIDA COUNCIL 79,
Respondent,
v.
CITY OF DEFUNIAK SPRINGS,
Intervenor.
PERC determines that the
petition is sufficient.
ANeither party filed an
exception to the HORO. Fla. Admin. Code Rule 28-106.217...
Pursuant to Section
447.307(8), Florida Statutes, the Commission ORDERS that a secret ballot
election be held in the bargaining unit as soon as is practicable.@
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
RC-2001-050;Order
01E-315(December 6, 2001)
PINELLAS LODGE NO. 43,
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG,
Respondent,
v.
PINELLAS COUNTY POLICE
BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC, Intervenor.
PERC determines that the
petition is sufficient and orders a secret ballot election for a unit composed
of police officers below the rank of sergeant, identification technicians, and
fingerprint technicians.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
UC-2001-052;Order
01E-316(December 7, 2001)
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO.
769, AFFILIATED WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF FELLSMERE,
Respondent.
PERC grants the petition to
clarify unit 1323 and accepts the corporal re-classification to sergeant and
the sergeant re-classification to lieutenant, since the duties of the personnel
in the unit have not changed.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
EL-2001-046 (Relates to
RC-2001-038)(December 7, 2001)
SEMINOLE COUNTY
PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS, LOCAL 3254, IAFF, Petitioner,
v.
SEMINOLE COUNTY,
Respondent.
Election results and order
certifying unit 1352 for all battalion chiefs employed by the County. Eleven eligible voters cast eight ballots
for and three against the union.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
CA-2001-067;Order
01GC-317(December 7, 2001)
SERVICE EMPLOYEES
INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 362, Charging Party,
v.
ORANGE COUNTY LIBRARY
SYSTEM, Respondent.
The General Counsel
summarily dismisses the charge that the employer violated the Act by failing to
return borrowed tapes of the bargaining session to the union.
ALocal 362 alleges that it
videotaped bargaining sessions between itself and OCLS. At one of the early sessions, OCLS attorney
Alan McKenna asked if OCLS could obtain copies of the tapes. Local 362 agreed to make copies of the tapes
for $120.00. The $120.00 was paid at
the time Local 362 gave the first set of tapes to OCLS. It was agreed that $120.00 would cover the
full cost of copying all of the bargaining sessions. Local 362 copied and presented to OCLS approximately one-half to
two-thirds of the tapes...
Local 362's charge must be
dismissed because there is no evidence that OCLS engaged in any conduct
prohibited by section 447.501(1)(e),
Florida Statutes. The OCLS has
not become entangled in Local 362's internal affairs, or exerted improper
influence over Local 362's intra-union activities. Although it is apparent that Local 362 and OCLS are having a
problem resolving the issue of payment for tapes of bargaining sessions, there
is no evidence that this problem constitutes an unfair labor practice.@
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
UC-2001-049;Order
01E-318(December 10, 2001)
PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS
OF MARCO ISLAND, LOCAL 2887, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF MARCO ISLAND,
Respondent.
PERC dismisses the petition
to clarify unit 616. AIn the absence of evidence
that the driver/engineer classification is newly-created or has been
substantially altered, or that the classification was omitted from the unit
through inadvertence or misunderstanding, Local 2887 has failed to pass the
threshold test of demonstrating that the Commission's unit clarification
procedure has been appropriately invoked, See Sarasota County PBA v.
City of Sarasota, 7 FPER & 12339 .1981). Moreover, in the absence of any information
about the driver/engineer classification to demonstrate a community of interest
with current members of the bargaining unit, it is not possible to determine
whether inclusion of the driver/engineer classification therein would be
appropriate.@
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
MS-2001-003 (Relates to
CA-99-068);Order 01E-319(December 10, 2001)
PALM BEACH COUNTY POLICE
BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF GREENACRES,
Respondent.
PERC denies the motion to
reopen the record, because the clerical errors complained of can be corrected
in the court appeal and the case has already been delayed for over a year.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
PART II . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Court Orders
[From Attorney General=s Appellate Alert]
5th District
Court of Appeal
**ARetaliation for filing of workers'
comp claim... A public employee claiming
improper retaliation does not have to prevail in a workers' compensation case
in order to be able to claim he suffered retaliation for filing the claim, the
5th DCA said.
John Smalbein claims his
name was removed from a list of substitute teachers as wrongful retaliation
against him for having filed a workers' compensation claim stemming from an
automobile accident. Smalbein lost on
his claim for workers' compensation when a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC)
concluded that the accident was not compensable as work-related. The Volusia County School Board argued that
the trial court was bound by the JCC's factual determinations and that
Smalbein's retaliation claim was not a "valid" claim because the JCC
ruled that his claim was not compensable.
The DCA ruled for Smalbein, reversing a summary judgment against him.
"We find that
interpreting >valid= as >compensable= thwarts the purpose and
intent of the Legislature to prohibit retaliation whereas construing a valid
claim as a meritorious one provides the proper protection to injured employees
seeking benefits without over-extending the protection to employees who file
frivolous claims," the DCA said.
[Smalbein v. Volusia County School Board, 11/30/01]@
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
==================================================================
CITATION
DISCLAIMER - This summary should not be cited. For that purpose, the
cases may be acquired by contacting FSLRS, PERC, FEN district representatives,
FPELRA representatives, jurisdiction labor relations officers or their
attorneys for particular cases.
The Florida School Labor Relations Service
is a joint venture of the
Florida School Boards Association
and the
Florida Association of District School
Superintendents".
Its publications
are designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to
public employee labor relations and collective bargaining. This information is provided with the
understanding that FSLRS is not engaged in rendering legal service. If legal advice or assistance is required,
contact your attorney.
==================================================================
Marcus Johnston,
Executive Director
Florida School
Labor Relations Service
203 South Monroe
Street
Tallahassee,
Florida 32301
850/414-2587
- SUNCOM 994-2587
FAX -
850/414-2585 - SUNCOM 994-2585